Concrete has a significant environmental impact due to factors such as carbon dioxide emissions, depletion of natural resources, and the generation of waste materials. Each year, approximately 1.6 billion tons of concrete is produced, contributing to around 7% of global carbon dioxide emissions. The production process requires substantial energy consumption and releases significant greenhouse gas emissions.
Furthermore, the extraction of aggregate and the use of water in concrete production contribute to the depletion of natural resources and potential water contamination. Admixtures, which are often used to enhance concrete properties, can also have negative environmental effects. Additionally, the limited durability of concrete, typically designed for a service life of 50 years, contributes to its environmental impact. If concrete could be made more durable, it would reduce the rate of natural resource consumption. Various techniques exist to decrease the environmental impact of concrete, and this article will explore these methods in detail.
What are Methods to Reduce Environmental Impact of Concrete?
To reduce the environmental impact of concrete, several methods can be employed. Firstly, cement conservation strategies aim to minimize the amount of cement used in concrete production. By optimizing the mixture proportions and utilizing alternative materials or supplementary cementitious materials, such as fly ash or slag, the overall cement content can be reduced without compromising the performance of the concrete.
Another approach is aggregate conservation, which involves reducing the amount of natural aggregates used in concrete. This can be achieved by incorporating recycled aggregates or using alternative materials like crushed concrete or industrial by-products as partial replacements for natural aggregates. By doing so, the demand for extracting and processing virgin aggregates can be minimized, leading to reduced environmental impact.
Water conservation is also vital in concrete production. Efficient water management practices, such as using high-performance admixtures, optimizing mixing and curing techniques, and employing recycling or reusing water, can significantly reduce water consumption without compromising the quality and workability of the concrete. These measures contribute to conserving water resources and minimizing the environmental footprint of concrete production.
Lastly, focusing on concrete durability is crucial for reducing the environmental impact. Enhancing the durability properties of concrete, such as improving resistance to chemical attack, corrosion, and freeze-thaw cycles, can increase the lifespan of concrete structures. This reduces the need for frequent repairs or replacements, thereby reducing resource consumption and waste generation.
By implementing these methods – cement conservation, aggregate conservation, water conservation, and concrete durability enhancement – the environmental impact associated with concrete production can be effectively mitigated. These strategies contribute to sustainable construction practices by minimizing resource depletion, reducing waste generation, and conserving natural resources.
Read Also: Rice Husk Ash Concrete Characteristics – Workability, Strength and Admixtures
Environmental Impact Reduction through Efficient Cement Utilization in Concrete
Conserving cement is crucial for reducing energy usage and greenhouse gas emissions in the concrete industry. By prioritizing resource productivity, we can reduce the reliance on Portland cement while still meeting the growing demand for concrete. To achieve this, it is essential to promote the use of pozzolanic materials like ground granulated blast furnace slag, fly ash, and silica fume as replacements for cement.
Currently, these by-product admixtures are mainly used in low-value applications such as landfills and road sub-bases. However, incorporating them into structural applications can significantly decrease the need for cement production and lead to more sustainable concrete products. Studies show that replacing 50% of cement with slag or fly ash results in a more durable product compared to using only Portland cement, thereby reducing the consumption of natural resources.
Additionally, concrete mixes with a high percentage of cementitious materials may have slower setting and hardening times, but this issue can be mitigated by using superplasticizers. In the future, the construction industry may prioritize resource maximization over labor productivity, which could allow for slower construction processes that align with sustainable practices.
Conservation of Aggregates: A Key Approach to Minimize Concrete’s Environmental Impact
In North America, Japan, and Europe, a significant portion of construction and demolition waste consists of old broken concrete and masonry. Utilizing these waste materials as coarse aggregates can greatly enhance material productivity. Additionally, dredge sand and mining waste, which are abundant in various countries worldwide, can be processed and utilized as fine aggregates.
Although processing these waste materials incurs some costs, it can prove to be economical, particularly in countries where waste disposal expenses are high and land availability is limited. The recycling and reusing of waste materials play a crucial role in addressing natural resource depletion issues in many regions and reducing the high costs associated with transporting virgin aggregates over long distances.
Lauritzen claims that approximately 1 billion tons of concrete and masonry rubble are generated annually, with only a small fraction of this waste being reused. Consequently, the costly nature of waste disposal and environmental concerns have motivated numerous European countries to set short-term goals of recycling between 50% to 90% of construction and demolition waste.
Lastly, it is worth noting that recycled aggregate, especially masonry aggregate, possesses higher porosity compared to natural aggregate. This higher porosity affects the water demand required to produce fresh concrete and can have a detrimental impact on the mechanical properties of hardened concrete. To address this issue, a combination of natural and recycled aggregate can be employed, or alternative measures such as incorporating fly ash and water-reducing admixtures can be utilized in concrete production.
How to Reduce Environmental Impact of Concrete by Water Conservation
According to a report by Hawken et al., the availability of fresh and clean water is constantly decreasing, with only 3% of all water on Earth being fresh water. Most of this fresh water is either located deep beneath the Earth’s surface or trapped in rapidly melting glaciers. The growing demands of industry, agriculture, and urban areas are causing the water table to drop and water contamination to increase. To address this issue, it is recommended that we utilize existing resources more efficiently.
One significant area where water consumption is high is in the production of concrete. Concrete producers and other major water consumers should be required to use water more efficiently. For instance, it is estimated that around 100 liters of water per cubic meter is used to clean ready-mix trucks, and a substantial amount of water is employed in the mixing process. By increasing the use of mineral admixtures, superplasticizers, and improving the grading of aggregate, it is believed that we can reduce the annual water consumption for mixing by half, which currently stands at one trillion liters.
In addition, it is essential to enforce the use of brackish water and recycled water from industrial sources instead of clean water, particularly for washing equipment. This should be made mandatory after test results confirm their suitability. Furthermore, significant water savings can be achieved by using retarders for fresh returned concrete.
Lastly, during the curing process of concrete, water usage can be reduced by applying a textile material. This textile should have an impermeable membrane on the exterior side and a water-absorbent fabric on the interior side. Such a system would help conserve water resources.
In conclusion, addressing the water scarcity issue requires the efficient utilization of available resources. Concrete production is a significant water-consuming industry, and measures such as the increased use of additives, the substitution of clean water with brackish and recycled water, and the use of retarders and innovative curing methods can contribute to significant water savings.
Read Also: Heat Resistant Concrete or Refractory Concrete – Installation and Applications
How to Reduce Environmental Impact of Concrete by Concrete Durability
Enhancing the durability of concrete offers a long-term solution and significant breakthrough in improving the productivity of the concrete industry while reducing its environmental impact. For example, if concrete structures are designed to have a service life of 500 years instead of 50 years, the resource productivity of the concrete industry could increase by a factor of 10. The durability of modern structures is often questionable, as deterioration can begin as early as 20 years after construction.
In contrast, there are ancient buildings and seawalls constructed from unreinforced Roman concrete that have maintained their good condition for nearly 2000 years. This stark difference can be attributed to the considerably crack-prone nature of Portland cement concrete used today, which becomes permeable over time. Additionally, the steel reinforcement in permeable concrete corrodes, leading to progressive damage to the structure.
In modern times, the construction industry is driven by a culture of accelerating construction speed, resulting in the widespread use of large amounts of high early strength Portland cement. Consequently, weak crack-resistant concrete structures are often built due to significant drying shrinkage, thermal contraction, and limited creep relaxation.
On the other hand, Roman concrete, made with a mixture of volcanic ash and hydrated lime, created a homogenous hydrated product that set and hardened at a slower pace, yet thermodynamically superior to hydrated Portland cement. Moreover, Roman concrete used less water and exhibited reduced cracking compared to Portland cement concrete. Therefore, if concrete durability is a major concern, the focus should shift towards producing less crack-prone concrete rather than prioritizing high-speed construction. This paradigm change is crucial for the construction industry.
It has been demonstrated that most cracking and shrinkage in concrete can be prevented, leading to the production of highly durable concrete, by reducing the water-to-cementitious material ratio through the application of superplasticizers. An example of successful implementation is a large monolithic concrete foundation of a temple in Kauai, an island in the Pacific Ocean, described by Mehta and Langley. This foundation comprised two parallel slabs of unreinforced concrete.
To minimize shrinkage stresses, a substantial reduction in Portland cement and water content was necessary. The concrete used for the foundation had a slump of 125±25 mm and achieved a compressive strength of 20 MPa after 90 days with a temperature rise of 13°C. After nearly two years, the exposed surface of the foundation was carefully examined, revealing no evidence of cracks. Core samples taken from the slab demonstrated not only a better homogeneity of the hydration product compared to conventional concrete but also a strong bond between the aggregate and the hydration product.
This bond is a prerequisite for achieving crack-resistant and highly durable concrete. A thin section of a core sample from the slab (Figure 2) shows no interfacial micro-cracking between coarse aggregate and adjacent cement mortar, while Figure 3 illustrates how interfacial aggregate-paste micro-cracks connect and allow the ingress of fluid from the outside. The mixture proportions used to produce the concrete for the temple foundation in Kauai are shown in Table-1.
Table-1: Mixture Proportions of Crack Resistant High Volume Fly Ash Concrete
| Constituents of the mixture | Proportions by weight (Kg/m3) |
| Type I Portland cement | 106 |
| Class F fly ash | 142 |
| Water | 100 |
| Crushed calcareous sand | 944 |
| Crushed basalt rock 25mm maximum size | 1120 |
| Superplasticizer | 3.5 L/m3 |