Sour weight loss corrosion of carbon steel occurs when H2S dissolves in brine to form a weak acid which lowers the solution pH to around 5.5-6.0 leading to general corrosion to carbon steel.
Weight Loss Sour Corrosion | Materials And Corrosion Control
Damage Mechanism | Sour Weight Loss Corrosion |
Damage Description |
· Sour weight loss corrosion of carbon steel occurs when H2S dissolves in brine to form a weak acid which lowers the solution pH to around 5.5-6.0 leading to general corrosion to carbon steel. The passivity of iron sulfide corrosion products on a carbon steel surface mainly controls the severity of sour corrosion. Since the poly sulfide is a weak acid in comparison with carbonic acid, sour corrosion is less aggressive than sweet corrosion. |
Critical factors |
· For H2S/CO2 > 0.3 : API 5CT carbon steel production tubing and casing
· For H2S/CO2<0.3 and H2S>100 ppm : for tubing (Alloy-28 or higher), for machining parts (nickel-base PH CRAs such as · Material selection is strongly tied up with a work-over strategy. · H2S content, pH, temperature, velocity and oxygen concentration are all critical factors. · H2S/CO2 ratio: Sour wells generally co-produce sweet gas as well. So, a H2S/CO2 ratio is one of the critical factors controlling sour weight loss corrosion. · Sour corrosion is flow-dependent. Flow regime and flow rate with temperature are one of the dominant factors controlling sweet corrosion. The passivity of the corrosion products is affected by flow velocity, flow character, H2S/CO2 ratio, water cut, hydrocarbon type. · Unlike sweet corrosion, sour corrosion is almost independent to temperature · However, sour corrosion becomes very aggressive in the presence of strong oxidizers such as dissolved oxygen. Iron sulfide itself could promote galvanic effect when iron sulfide partially covers a steel surface but its tendency promoting localized corrosion is not as aggressive as other strong oxidizers. |
Affected Units or Equipment |
· Sub-surface equipment:
§ Production: Wellhead components, tubing hangers, hanger subs, R & X nipples, flow couplings, production tubing, casing, production liner, tail pipe, PBR seal and packer assemblies, sand screens, and other downhole accessories § Drilling: drill pipe, heavy weight drill pipe, drill collars, drill jars, cross-over subs, tool joints, drill bits, bit subs, Kellys, § Workover: coiled tubing, wirelines, fishing tools (over-shots, tubing/casing spears, milling tools, reverse circulating junk catchers, fishing magnets, fishing jars, wash over pipe) |
Appearance or Morphology of Damage |
· Corrosion damage from acidic sour water is typically general thinning.
· Localized corrosion would occur in sour gas wells where gas flow rates affect flow regime inside the tubing but the metal loss is not as aggressive as classical pitting corrosion. It can be called as localized weight loss corrosion. · Localized corrosion or localized under-deposit attack can occur, especially if oxygen or elemental sulfur is present. |
Prevention/Mitigation |
Internal coating must be abrasion-resistant and corrosion-resistant. Currently, CSD does not allow any organic coatings yet and is seeking a proper coating system.
Limited application of corrosion inhibitors for downhole treatment because of the lack of treatment facilities. Material selection or corrosion inhibitor treatment is oftentimes employed for mitigation. A continuous corrosion inhibitor treatment is oftentimes employed for protecting surface facilities such as flowlines and trunklines in sour service. But proper materials selection is cost-effective for sub-surface facilities. When a H2S/CO2 ratio is less than 0.2 (?), Alloy-28 needs to be employed for downhole equipment. Carbon steel can be used when H2S/CO2 ratio is greater than 0.2 but a workover strategy should be consulted. |
Inspection/Monitoring |
· Monitoring downhole sour corrosion is difficult because iron sulfides as a passive film on a steel surface interfere caliper logging.
· Evidence of locally thinned areas for surface facilities can be found using scanning ultrasonic thickness methods or profile radiography. · For carbon steel, damage is usually in the form general thinning but may be highly localized to specific areas of high velocity or turbulence, typically where a water phase is condensing. · Process and corrosion monitoring are important aspects of a well-developed program to minimize the effects of acidic sour water corrosion. · Properly placed corrosion probes and corrosion coupons provide additional information on the rate and extent of potential damage for surface facilities. |
Inspection Frequency |
· Pay attention to TCA pressurwe build-up because sour weight loss corrosion is most pronounced at the pin/box end. |
KPIs |
· Sub-surface: Workover interval >10 years
· Surface: corrosion <5 mpy |
Competencies and Training |
· Corrosion Courses
§ e-COE 101 Corrosion Basics § e-COE 701 Corrosion & Corrosion Prevention § PEW 407 Corrosion Technology § COE 104 Chemical Treatment for Producing Operations |
Reference Resources (Standards/GIs/BPs) |
· SAES-L-133
· ISO 15156 (NACE MR0175-2002) · NACE “H2S Corrosion in Oil and Gas Production – A compilation of Classic Papers (1981) · API “Corrosion of Oil and Gas-Well Equipment,1990 · NACE “Corrosion Control in Petroleum Production” TPC Publication 5, 1999 · Bruce D. Craig, “The Nature of Sulfides Formed on Steel in an H2S-O2 Environment,” CORROSION Vol. 35, No. 3, · C. P. Dillon, “Corrosion Control in the Chemical Process Industries,” MTI Publication No. 45, Second Edition, · Denny A. Jones, “Principles and Prevention of Corrosion,” Prentice-Hall, Inc., NY, 1996. · Bruce D. Craig, “Sour-Gas Design Considerations,” Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) Monograph Series, Monograph Volume 15, TX, 1993. |
Sour Water Corrosion | Materials And Corrosion Control(Opens in a new browser tab)
Sweet Corrosion | Materials And Corrosion Control(Opens in a new browser tab)